Copy
Trading Bots
Events

Why On-Chain Automation Still Feels Clunky in 2025 — Are We Missing the Next Big Defi Breakthrough?

CryptoSavant  · 2025-12-12 ·  11 days ago
117

BYD.1765474967981.image.png

Hey crypto tech community — in 2025, we still can’t do simple things on-chain like native DCA buys, automatic stop-losses, or conditional transactions without relying on third-party keepers like Chainlink or Gelato. That feels weird in a “decentralized” ecosystem — so why is it still so awkward?


Lots of devs and builders suggest this isn’t just a UI issue — it’s fundamental: protocol complexity, security risks from external price oracles, and the economics of keepers all play a role. Some projects (like Aptos Labs with “Event-Driven Transactions”) are trying to build automation into the core chain itself — but adoption is slow and not everyone agrees it’s the right fix.


What do you think: what’s the real bottleneck? Is DeFi automation a missing piece that could unlock huge user growth — or will decentralization always depend on external services?

1 Answer

  • The core issue is state management & security. Blockchains weren’t designed to “remember and trigger” actions at scale — they were designed to confirm transactions. Adding automation means the chain has to track millions of pending conditions, and that’s a nightmare for state capacity and gas costs. That’s not a trivial problem — it’s fundamental protocol design.

Create Answer