CoinTalk

Major Crypto Fund Shifts to NYSE in Landmark Move for Digital Asset Investing

Bitwise’s flagship crypto index product transitions from over-the-counter trading to a premier regulated exchange, bridging the gap between digital assets and traditional finance.

SAN FRANCISCO — In a significant stride toward mainstream financial acceptance, Bitwise Asset Management announced its premier 10 Crypto Index Fund (BITW) will begin trading on the NYSE Arca exchange effective immediately. This transition from the over-the-counter (OTC) markets marks a pivotal moment, placing a diversified cryptocurrency product squarely within the infrastructure of a major, regulated national securities exchange for the first time.

The move signals a maturing phase for crypto investment vehicles, offering institutional and retail investors a familiar, streamlined path to gain exposure to the digital asset ecosystem. BITW will now trade as an exchange-traded product on the same electronic platform used by hundreds of traditional ETFs.

Investors believe in the future of crypto, but they don’t want the burden of picking single winners, stated Matt Hougan, Bitwise’s Chief Investment Officer. This uplisting provides a trusted, regulated, and diversified avenue to invest in the overarching thesis of crypto’s growth—all within the brokerage accounts they already use.

A Fund Designed for the Crypto Ecosystem

For years, the strategy for the world's largest retailers was simple: if you need technology, you build it. Titans of industry poured billions into internal innovation labs, convinced that their sheer size and budget would allow them to out-develop any startup.

For a while, it worked. But in 2025, that narrative has collapsed. Despite boasting global reach and virtually unlimited resources, major corporations are realizing that money does not guarantee innovation. In fact, in the fast-moving world of Web3 and digital finance, their size has become their biggest weakness.

The Trap of Scale

On paper, a retail giant should crush a small fintech startup. They have the brand, the customers, and the capital. But in practice, scale is a double-edged sword.

Every new product idea within a massive corporation must survive a gauntlet of bureaucracy. It faces legal reviews, risk assessments, and endless board meetings. A feature that a fintech startup can build and test in two weeks might take a corporate retailer a year just to get approved.

While retailers are stuck in meetings, fintech "disruptors" are shipping code. They are testing white-label products, deploying localized lending solutions, and building on blockchain rails that settle billions of dollars in stablecoins daily.

Why In-House Innovation is Failing

The failure of the "build it yourself" model comes down to shareholder pressure. Publicly traded retailers are forced to prioritize predictable quarterly earnings. This makes them risk-averse. Resources that should go toward experimental, high-growth products are instead funneled into safe, incremental upgrades.

Fintechs, by contrast, are designed to take risks. They don't have the same regulatory baggage or the pressure to protect a legacy business model. This agility allows them to find product-market fit years before the incumbents even understand the technology.

The New Strategy: Partnership Over Pride

Smart retailers are waking up to reality. We are seeing a pivot from competition to collaboration.

• Walmart recently switched its Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) provider, realizing an agile fintech partner could adapt to consumer needs faster than an internal team.
• Shein launched a co-branded credit card with a Mexican fintech, acknowledging that local expertise beats global genericism.

This is the winning formula for the next decade: Fintechs bring the rails; retailers bring the reach.

By partnering, retailers get instant access to cutting-edge infrastructure—like crypto payments, loyalty NFTs, and seamless cross-border settlements—without the headache of building it from scratch.

Blockchain is the Ultimate Litmus Test

The divide is clearest when looking at blockchain adoption. While retailers are still debating if crypto is a fad, fintechs have already built the bridges. They are using blockchain to slash transaction fees, eliminate chargebacks, and create programmable loyalty rewards.

Retailers who insist on "going it alone" will find themselves rebuilding the wheel while their competitors are already driving the car.

Conclusion

The era of the monolithic, do-it-all corporation is ending. In today's market, speed matters more than size. The retailers that will dominate the future are the ones humble enough to admit they can't build everything—and smart enough to partner with the fintech's that can.

Key Takeaways:

• Burning is the irreversible act of sending cryptocurrency to a "null address" that no one can access.
• Projects utilize token burning to create artificial scarcity, which can theoretically drive up the price of the remaining tokens.
• Mechanisms like EIP-1559 on Ethereum automatically burn a portion of transaction fees to offset inflation.

Token burning is a concept that sounds insane to a traditional banker. Why would anyone intentionally destroy money? In the physical world, burning cash is illegal and illogical.

But in the cryptocurrency economy of 2026, it is one of the most powerful tools for value creation. It acts as a deflationary force, counteracting the inflation of mining rewards.

By permanently removing assets from the circulating supply, a project can reward its long-term holders without actually paying them a dividend. It is the digital equivalent of a stock buyback, but faster and transparent on the blockchain.

How Does the Burning Process Work?

You might picture a digital fire, but the reality of token burning is more technical. To burn a token, you send it to a "Null Address" (also known as an Eater Address).

This is a wallet address that was generated without a private key. Because there is no key, the funds sent there can never be accessed or spent again.

Once the transaction is confirmed on the blockchain, the tokens are subtracted from the total supply. They still exist on the ledger as a record, but they are effectively dead capital.

Why Do Projects Burn Tokens?

The primary motivation is supply and demand. If demand remains steady while the supply decreases via token burning, the price per unit should mathematically rise.

Many exchanges and projects, like Binance with BNB or MakerDAO, use a portion of their profits to buy back tokens from the open market and burn them. This returns value to the investors. If you hold the token, your slice of the pie gets slightly bigger every time a burn happens, simply because the total pie got smaller.

How Does Ethereum Use Burning?

The most famous example of this mechanism is Ethereum. Following the EIP-1559 upgrade years ago, the network began burning a portion of every gas fee paid by users.

During periods of high network activity, token burning on Ethereum can outpace the issuance of new ETH to stakers. This turns Ethereum into a "deflationary" asset. Instead of the supply growing every year like the US Dollar, the supply of ETH can actually shrink, making it scarcer over time.

What Is Proof-of-Burn?

Beyond economics, burning can also be used for security. "Proof-of-Burn" is a consensus mechanism used by some niche blockchains.

Instead of mining with electricity (Proof-of-Work) or locking up capital (Proof-of-Stake), miners demonstrate their commitment to the network by destroying coins. The more they burn, the higher their chance of being selected to validate the next block. It is a way to buy virtual mining power by sacrificing immediate wealth.

Conclusion

Scarcity is the ultimate value driver. Token burning provides a verifiable, transparent way for projects to prove they are committed to protecting the value of their currency.

Key Takeaways:

• EigenLayer introduces "restaking" which allows users to use their staked ETH to secure multiple protocols simultaneously.
• This solves the difficult "bootstrapping" problem for new crypto projects by letting them rent security from Ethereum.
• While it offers higher yields for investors it also introduces higher risks of penalty slashing.

EigenLayer is arguably the most significant upgrade to the Ethereum economy since The Merge. In the past, if you staked your Ethereum, it performed one specific job. It secured the Ethereum mainnet and earned a steady, low-risk yield.

But in 2026, the market demands efficiency. This protocol introduced a groundbreaking concept called "restaking." It allows that same staked ETH to be reused to secure other applications. It effectively turns Ethereum trust into a commodity that can be exported to anyone who needs it.

What Problem Does It Solve?

Before EigenLayer, launching a new decentralized network was incredibly difficult. If you wanted to build a new Oracle network or a Sidechain, you had to find your own validators.

You had to convince people to buy your new, volatile token and stake it to secure your network. This is known as the "bootstrapping problem." It is expensive and often leads to weak security because the new token has low value.

EigenLayer fixes this by creating a marketplace for decentralized trust. New projects don't need to build their own security from scratch. They can simply rent the massive security shield of the Ethereum network.

How Does Restaking Actually Work?

The mechanism is surprisingly simple yet powerful. Users who have already staked ETH (either directly or via liquid staking tokens like stETH) can opt-in to the EigenLayer smart contracts.

By doing so, they agree to grant the protocol the ability to slash their stake if they misbehave. In exchange for taking on this extra risk, they earn extra rewards.

Instead of earning just the 3% or 4% from Ethereum staking, the user earns that base yield plus additional yield from the new protocols they are securing. It creates a "double dip" opportunity for capital efficiency.

What Are Actively Validated Services (AVS)?

The customers in this ecosystem are called Actively Validated Services (AVS). An AVS can be anything that requires decentralized validation.

This includes data availability layers, new virtual machines, oracle networks, or bridges. Because of EigenLayer, an AVS can launch rapidly. They don't need to spend years building a validator set. They just tap into the existing pool of Ethereum restakers and pay them a fee for their service.

Is Restaking Risky?

There is no such thing as free yield. The primary risk is "Slashing." If a validator acts maliciously or makes a technical error, a portion of their staked ETH is confiscated.

When you restake on EigenLayer, you are subjecting your funds to the slashing rules of multiple protocols at once. If the AVS has buggy code, you could lose money even if you did nothing wrong.

Furthermore, Vitalik Buterin has warned about "systemic risk." If the protocol gets too big, a failure could theoretically threaten the stability of the entire Ethereum mainnet.

Conclusion

Restaking has fundamentally changed the math of DeFi. It has transformed ETH from a simple asset into the foundational bedrock of crypto security. As the ecosystem matures, EigenLayer continues to be the dominant force driving yield generation for Ethereum holders.

MicroStrategy has fundamentally changed the playbook for how public companies manage their treasury assets. Under the leadership of Michael Saylor the software firm transformed itself into the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin in the world. As we move through 2026 the scale of their operation has only grown larger and more aggressive. They are no longer just buying Bitcoin with spare cash. They are engineering a complex financial machine designed to swallow the available supply of digital gold.

The core of the MicroStrategy plan involves a unique arbitrage of the capital markets. The company creates shares and debt instruments to sell to investors. Because the stock market currently places a premium on their shares relative to the actual Bitcoin they hold the company can issue stock at a high price and use the proceeds to buy more Bitcoin. This creates a cycle that increases the amount of Bitcoin per share for existing investors. It is a strategy that focuses on accretion rather than just price appreciation.

The Mechanics of the 21 21 Plan

The roadmap for this accumulation was originally dubbed the 21 21 plan. The goal was simple but ambitious. MicroStrategy announced it would raise $21 billion in equity and $21 billion in fixed income securities over a three year period. This massive war chest is deployed directly into the Bitcoin Spot market.

By issuing convertible notes the company borrows money at incredibly low interest rates. Investors are willing to lend at near zero percent interest because they get the option to convert that debt into stock if the price rises. MicroStrategy takes this cheap capital and buys Bitcoin which has historically appreciated at a rate far higher than the interest on the debt. This spread between the cost of capital and the appreciation of the asset is the engine driving their valuation to new heights.

Risks and Volatility

While the strategy has been incredibly profitable it does not come without risks. The volatility of MicroStrategy stock is often double or triple that of Bitcoin itself. If the price of Bitcoin were to crash continuously over a multi year period the company would still owe the interest payments on its massive debt load. However the structure of the debt is long term which gives them the ability to weather short term bear markets without being forced to sell their holdings.

Institutional FOMO

The success of this strategy has triggered a wave of copycats. Other public companies are now looking at the MicroStrategy model and asking if they should adopt a similar standard. We are seeing the beginning of a corporate race to accumulate scarce assets. As more companies enter the arena the supply shock intensifies. There are only 21 million Bitcoin that will ever exist and Michael Saylor intends to own as many of them as possible.

Conclusion

The MicroStrategy experiment is one of the boldest financial strategies in history. They have effectively turned a software company into a leveraged Bitcoin volatility instrument. For investors the lesson is clear. The race for digital scarcity is on and the biggest players are using every tool in the financial system to win.

Key Takeaways:

• Blockchains currently act like isolated islands that cannot communicate with each other effectively.
• Interoperability is the technological breakthrough allowing assets and data to flow freely between networks.
• The future of Web3 relies on "Chain Abstraction" where users do not need to know which chain they are using.

Interoperability is the buzzword that will define the next decade of the cryptocurrency industry. For the last few years we have witnessed an explosion of new Layer 1 and Layer 2 blockchains. While this innovation is exciting it has created a massive problem known as fragmentation.

Imagine if you could only send emails to people who used the same email provider as you. If a Gmail user could not email an Outlook user the internet would be broken. This is exactly how the blockchain space operates today.

Ethereum users are stuck on Ethereum. Solana users are trapped on Solana. For the promise of a truly decentralized internet to be realized these walled gardens must be torn down. We need a unified network where value moves seamlessly.

Why Is the Blockchain Ecosystem So Fragmented?

The root of the problem lies in the architecture of the technology. Blockchains are distinct ledgers with their own languages and security rules. Bitcoin does not "speak" the same language as Ethereum.

Because they cannot communicate natively developers have had to build their own isolated ecosystems. This forces users to manage multiple wallets and remember dozens of seed phrases. It creates friction that scares away mainstream adoption.

In 2026 the user experience is finally shifting. We are moving away from a multi chain world to a cross chain world. This shift is driven by the demand for liquidity that is not trapped in silos.

How Does Interoperability Actually Work?

The solution comes in the form of cross chain messaging protocols and bridges. Interoperability allows a smart contract on one chain to read data and trigger actions on another chain.

Think of it as a universal translator. When you want to use your Bitcoin in a DeFi application on Ethereum you wrap it. The protocol locks your BTC in a vault on the Bitcoin network and issues an equivalent token on the Ethereum network.

This technology is evolving beyond just moving tokens. It now allows for "Chain Abstraction." This means a user can play a game or buy an NFT without even knowing which blockchain is running in the background. The complexity is hidden by the interoperability layer.

Is This Different From Centralized Exchanges?

Yes it is fundamentally different. Centralized exchanges act as trusted middlemen. They hold all the assets in their own wallets and update an internal database when you trade.

True interoperability is trustless. It relies on code rather than a company to ensure the assets are safe. It fulfills the original vision of crypto which is to remove the need for a central authority.

However this introduces security risks. Bridges have historically been the most hacked sector in crypto. As the technology matures in 2026 the focus is heavily on security audits and decentralized validation to prevent these exploits.

What Does the Future of Web3 Look Like?

The end game is a seamless internet of value. In the future you will not care if an application is built on Base or Arbitrum. You will simply connect your wallet and transact.

Liquidity will flow to where it is most efficient. Developers will build applications that leverage the speed of Solana for execution and the security of Ethereum for settlement. This modular future is only possible because of the advances in interoperability.

Conclusion

The walls between blockchains are crumbling. As we connect these isolated networks we unlock the true potential of decentralized finance. The fractured liquidity of the past is consolidating into a unified global economy.

MSCI’s Decision Marks a Turning Point for Crypto Treasury Companies

Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) has delivered a significant boost to crypto-linked equities by confirming that digital asset treasury companies will remain included in its global market indexes, at least for the time being. The announcement comes after weeks of speculation and intense investor debate, as market participants feared that a sudden exclusion could trigger massive capital outflows and damage confidence in publicly traded crypto-focused firms.

This decision was not made lightly. MSCI acknowledged growing feedback from institutional investors who argued that the crypto treasury model is still evolving and requires deeper analysis before any sweeping classification changes are enforced.

Strategy Shares React Strongly to the News

The market reaction was immediate and telling. Shares of Strategy, the company led by well-known Bitcoin advocate Michael Saylor and widely regarded as the world’s largest crypto treasury firm, jumped sharply in after-hours trading. Although the stock had dipped during regular trading hours, it reversed course and climbed around 5% once MSCI’s position became public.

The price movement highlighted just how sensitive crypto treasury companies are to index-related decisions. Inclusion in major benchmarks plays a crucial role in maintaining institutional demand, liquidity, and long-term investor confidence.

What MSCI Considers a Digital Asset Treasury Company

MSCI defines digital asset treasury companies, often referred to as DATCOs, as firms where digital assets account for 50% or more of total assets on the balance sheet. This definition places companies like Strategy squarely under the spotlight, as their business models are increasingly intertwined with long-term exposure to Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

Rather than enforcing immediate exclusions, MSCI announced that these companies will undergo a broader and more comprehensive review process aimed at distinguishing between operating businesses and entities whose primary activities resemble investment holdings.

Why MSCI Chose Caution Over Immediate Exclusion

In its official statement, MSCI explained that the broader consultation is intended to preserve consistency with the core objectives of its indexes. These benchmarks are designed to track the performance of operating companies, not entities that function primarily as investment vehicles.

However, MSCI also recognized that the rapid rise of crypto treasury strategies has blurred traditional boundaries. Many companies still generate revenue from software, technology, or other services while simultaneously holding large digital asset positions. This complexity makes a simple, one-size-fits-all exclusion approach increasingly difficult to justify.

Why Index Inclusion Matters for Crypto Stocks

Remaining inside MSCI indexes carries enormous implications. Inclusion ensures eligibility for passive index funds and ETFs, which collectively manage trillions of dollars in assets. These funds automatically allocate capital based on index composition, meaning that exclusion could have forced large-scale selling regardless of a company’s fundamentals.

Analysts estimate that removing major crypto treasury firms from indexes could have erased billions of dollars in passive capital inflows, putting sustained pressure on share prices and weakening institutional participation.

A Broader Signal to Institutional Investors

Beyond individual stocks, MSCI’s move sends a broader message to the market. It suggests that major financial infrastructure providers are not yet ready to push crypto-exposed companies to the sidelines. Instead, they are opting for a more measured approach that balances innovation with index integrity.

This stance may help stabilize sentiment around crypto-related equities, particularly after a volatile period in late 2025 when many crypto treasury stocks experienced sharp drawdowns amid concerns about sustainability and valuation.

The Rapid Growth of Corporate Crypto Treasuries

The rise of digital asset treasuries has been one of the most notable institutional trends of the past two years. More than 190 publicly traded companies now hold Bitcoin on their balance sheets, while dozens of others have diversified into Ether, Solana, and additional altcoins.

For many firms, crypto exposure is no longer a speculative side bet but a core strategic decision tied to long-term views on monetary policy, inflation, and digital finance.

What Comes Next for MSCI and Crypto Treasury Firms

While MSCI’s decision offers temporary relief, it is not the final word. The broader consultation process will likely shape how digital asset treasury companies are classified in future index reviews. Investors, asset managers, and companies themselves will be watching closely, as the outcome could redefine how crypto exposure fits into traditional equity markets.

For now, crypto treasury firms remain firmly in the game — and MSCI’s pause has given them valuable time to prove that their models deserve a lasting place in global indexes.