CoinTalk
A total of 2490 cryptocurrency questions
Share Your Thoughts with BYDFi
Trending
The Most Common Crypto Metrics Every Beginner Must Know
When you first start trading cryptocurrency, it is easy to get obsessed with the price. You see a green line going up, and you want to buy. You see a red line going down, and you panic. But professional traders know that price is just the tip of the iceberg.
To truly evaluate a project—to distinguish a future gem from a dying scam—you need to understand Fundamental Analysis. This relies on specific data points, or "metrics," that reveal the true health of a cryptocurrency. Here is your guide to the most essential numbers in the market.
The Big One: Market Capitalization
The most common mistake beginners make is looking at the price per coin and thinking it represents value. They see a token priced at $0.0001 and think, "If this goes to $1, I’ll be rich!"
This is usually mathematically impossible. You need to look at Market Cap.
- The Formula: Current Price x Circulating Supply.
- The Reality: Market Cap tells you the total value of the network. If a meme coin has a supply of 100 trillion, it cannot reach $1 because its Market Cap would exceed the entire global economy. Use Market Cap to compare the size and stability of projects, not the unit price.
Supply Dynamics: Circulating vs. Total vs. Max
Inflation can destroy your investment. That is why you must understand the three types of supply:
- Circulating Supply: The number of coins currently in the market. This determines the current market cap.
- Total Supply: The number of coins that have been created, including those locked up (e.g., held by the team or investors).
- Max Supply: The hard limit of coins that will ever exist (e.g., Bitcoin’s 21 million).
Why it matters: If the Circulating Supply is 10 million, but the Total Supply is 1 billion, huge amounts of tokens will eventually be unlocked and dumped onto the market. This dilutes the value of your holdings. Always check the "unlock schedule."
Trading Volume and Liquidity
Volume measures how much money has been traded for a specific coin in the last 24 hours.
- High Volume: Indicates strong interest and active participation. It confirms that a price trend is valid.
- Low Volume: Indicates disinterest. If a price spikes on low volume, it is likely a trap or a manipulation.
Volume is closely tied to Liquidity—how easily you can buy or sell without moving the price. Never buy a low-liquidity token unless you are prepared to be stuck with it when the market crashes.
Total Value Locked (TVL)
For the DeFi (Decentralized Finance) sector, the most critical metric is TVL. This measures the dollar value of all assets staked or deposited into a protocol’s smart contracts.
Think of TVL as a "trust score." If a decentralized exchange has $5 billion in TVL, it means users trust it enough to park their capital there. If the TVL is rising, the protocol is growing. If TVL is crashing, users are withdrawing their funds, and you should probably do the same.
On-Chain Activity: Active Addresses
Unlike the stock market, crypto is transparent. You can see exactly how many people are using the network by looking at Daily Active Addresses.
This metric filters out the noise. A token might have a high price due to speculation, but if the number of active wallet addresses is dropping, the project is a ghost town. Long-term value is driven by network adoption, and active addresses are the best proxy for user growth.
Conclusion
Successful investing isn't about guessing; it's about data. By combining Market Cap, Supply, Volume, and TVL, you can paint a complete picture of a project's potential. Don't just follow the hype—follow the metrics.
To analyze these charts and trade with professional tools, you need a robust platform. Join BYDFi today to access deep data and trade the market with confidence.
2026-01-16 · 19 days ago0 079Crypto Salaries: Bitcoin vs. Stablecoins Guide
Key Takeaways:
- Getting paid in Bitcoin offers high upside potential but comes with massive volatility risks for daily expenses.
- Stablecoins act as a safer alternative for payroll by combining the speed of crypto with the stability of fiat.
- New regulations in 2026 are pushing companies toward stablecoins to simplify tax compliance and accounting.
Crypto salaries were once considered a marketing stunt for tech CEOs and professional athletes. However in the current economic landscape of 2026 receiving part of your paycheck in digital assets has become a viable option for remote workers and freelancers globally. The appeal is obvious as it offers instant cross border payments and total control over your money.
But a major question remains for employees. Should you accept a volatile asset like Bitcoin or a pegged asset like USDC? The answer defines not just your potential wealth but your ability to pay your rent next month.
Can You Survive on Bitcoin Volatility?
The dream of crypto salaries usually involves Bitcoin. You imagine getting paid today and watching that paycheck double in value by next week. This works perfectly during a bull market.
The reality hits hard during a bear market. If your rent is three thousand dollars and Bitcoin drops twenty percent overnight you suddenly cannot pay your landlord. Living on a Bitcoin standard requires a massive cash buffer to smooth out these price swings.
Most financial advisors suggest that Bitcoin is excellent for savings but terrible for operating expenses. It creates a stressful scenario where you are constantly checking charts to see if you can afford groceries.
Why Are Stablecoins Taking Over Payroll?
This volatility problem is why stablecoins have become the dominant form of crypto salaries. Tokens pegged to the US Dollar like USDT or USDC offer the best of both worlds.
They move on the blockchain with the speed of an email but they hold their value like a dollar bill. For a remote worker in Argentina or the Philippines receiving USDC is often safer than holding their local inflating currency.
It also simplifies life for the employer. Companies do not want to hold volatile assets on their balance sheet. Paying in stablecoins allows them to budget accurately without worrying that their payroll liability will spike if the market rallies.
How Does Regulation Impact Your Paycheck?
Governments have finally caught up. In the past taking crypto salaries was a legal gray area. Now frameworks like MiCA in Europe and stablecoin bills in the US have clarified the rules.
Regulators generally favor stablecoins. They view them as "e-money" which fits neatly into existing labor laws. Bitcoin is often classified as a commodity or property which makes tax withholding a nightmare for HR departments.
This regulatory pressure is pushing the industry toward a standard. Most compliant crypto payroll companies now default to stablecoins for the base salary and offer Bitcoin only as a bonus or savings option.
H2: Is the Tax Complication Worth It?
You must consider the taxman. In many jurisdictions receiving crypto salaries triggers a taxable event immediately based on the fiat value at the time of receipt.
If you are paid in Bitcoin and it drops fifty percent you still owe taxes on the original higher amount. This trap has bankrupted people in previous cycles. Stablecoins eliminate this specific risk because their value does not fluctuate against the tax baseline.
Conclusion
The trend of crypto salaries is shifting from speculation to utility. The smart approach for most workers is a hybrid model. Take your base pay in stablecoins to cover your living costs and convert your savings into Bitcoin for long term growth.
You do not need your employer to set this up for you. You can do it yourself. Register at BYDFi today to easily convert your fiat paycheck into the digital assets of your choice.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Is it legal to get paid in crypto?
A: In most countries yes. As long as you report the income and pay the necessary income taxes governments allow crypto salaries.Q: Do I need a special bank account?
A: No you just need a crypto wallet. However you will need an off ramp (like an exchange) to convert your crypto back to fiat if you need to pay bills in cash.Q: Which stablecoin is best for salaries?
A: USDC and USDT are the industry standards due to their high liquidity and wide acceptance.2026-01-26 · 9 days ago0 078Global Sanctions Drive Record Flows to Illicit Crypto Addresses
Global Sanctions Ignite an Unprecedented Rise in Illicit Crypto Activity
Sanctions Pressure Reshapes the Crypto Underground
Global economic sanctions are increasingly pushing sanctioned governments, entities, and affiliated networks toward cryptocurrencies, driving illicit on-chain activity to historic highs. As traditional banking channels tighten under geopolitical pressure, digital assets are emerging as an alternative financial route for those seeking to bypass restrictions at scale.
Data from Chainalysis’ 2026 Crypto Crime Report shows that illicit cryptocurrency addresses received at least $154 billion throughout 2025, representing a dramatic 162% year-over-year increase compared with 2024. This surge marks the highest level ever recorded and reflects how sanctions are accelerating the evolution of crypto-based financial evasion.
Nation-States Take Center Stage in On-Chain Illicit Activity
What sets 2025 apart from previous years is the dominant role of nation-states. Chainalysis analysts describe the year as a clear inflection point, where state-linked actors became the primary drivers of illicit crypto flows. Rather than fragmented criminal networks, large-scale, coordinated activity linked to sanctioned governments defined the landscape.
According to the report, these actors moved funds at volumes never before observed on public blockchains. This shift signals a maturation of the illicit crypto ecosystem, where advanced strategies, purpose-built tokens, and structured on-chain behavior are increasingly common.
Russia’s A7A5 Token Highlights a New Strategy
Russia provides one of the most striking examples of this trend. Facing sweeping sanctions tied to the war in Ukraine, the country launched a ruble-backed stablecoin known as A7A5 in February 2025. In less than a year, transactions involving the token exceeded $93.3 billion, demonstrating how state-aligned digital assets can rapidly gain scale under financial isolation.
The rapid adoption of A7A5 illustrates how sanctioned nations are experimenting with crypto-native instruments to maintain trade flows, preserve liquidity, and reduce dependence on Western-controlled financial infrastructure.
Sanctions Reach Record Levels Worldwide
The growth in illicit crypto activity closely mirrors the global expansion of sanctions themselves. The Global Sanctions Inflation Index estimated that by May 2025, there were nearly 80,000 sanctioned individuals and entities worldwide. This reflects a sharp escalation over recent years as governments increasingly rely on sanctions as a geopolitical tool.
In the United States alone, the Center for a New American Security reported that more than 3,100 entities were added to the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List in 2024, an unprecedented figure. Each new designation further constrains access to traditional finance and increases incentives to explore alternative systems like crypto.
Stablecoins Dominate Illicit Crypto Flows
Stablecoins have become the backbone of illicit crypto activity, accounting for 84% of total illicit transaction volume in 2025, according to Chainalysis. This dominance mirrors trends in the legitimate crypto economy, where stablecoins continue to gain market share due to their efficiency and predictability.
Their appeal is straightforward. Stablecoins offer low volatility, fast cross-border settlement, and broad acceptance across exchanges and on-chain services. These same features that make them useful for businesses and consumers also make them attractive to sanctioned actors attempting to move large sums discreetly and efficiently.
Illicit Activity Remains a Small Share of the Market
Despite the alarming growth in absolute numbers, illicit crypto usage still represents a very small portion of overall blockchain activity. Chainalysis estimates that more than 99% of all crypto transactions are legitimate, with illicit activity accounting for less than 1% of total transaction volume.
While the illicit share increased slightly compared to 2024, analysts stress that it remains dwarfed by lawful usage. As attribution methods improve and more illicit addresses are identified, reported figures may rise further in 2026, but this will largely reflect better visibility rather than explosive criminal adoption.
Traditional Money Still Fuels Global Crime
Even with crypto’s growing role, fiat currency remains the dominant medium for illicit finance worldwide. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime has previously estimated that global criminal proceeds equal roughly 3.6% of global GDP, far exceeding the scale of illicit crypto flows.
This contrast underscores an important reality: while crypto is increasingly used to evade sanctions, it has not replaced traditional financial systems as the primary vehicle for criminal activity.
A New Intersection of Geopolitics and Blockchain
The data from 2025 makes one conclusion unavoidable. As sanctions expand and financial pressure intensifies, cryptocurrencies are becoming a strategic tool for sanctioned actors, including nation-states themselves. This evolution is reshaping how regulators, analysts, and policymakers view blockchain technology, not just as a financial innovation, but as a geopolitical instrument.
While the crypto economy remains overwhelmingly legitimate, the growing involvement of sanctioned governments marks a new and complex chapter for the industry—one where global politics and decentralized finance are increasingly intertwined.
As global sanctions reshape crypto flows and stablecoins gain dominance, choosing a secure and compliant trading platform is more important than ever. BYDFi offers a robust trading environment with advanced risk controls, deep liquidity, and support for major cryptocurrencies and stablecoins—making it a trusted choice for traders navigating today’s complex market.
2026-01-09 · a month ago0 077Yield-Bearing Stablecoins Could Create a ‘Dangerous’ Parallel Banking System, JPMorgan Warns
Yield-Bearing Stablecoins Spark Fresh Warnings From Wall Street
The debate over stablecoins has entered a new and more intense phase, as senior executives at JPMorgan Chase raise red flags over a fast-growing segment of the crypto market: yield-bearing stablecoins. While blockchain innovation continues to gain acceptance across traditional finance, concerns are mounting that certain stablecoin designs could quietly recreate banking functions without the protections that have defined the financial system for generations.
During JPMorgan’s latest earnings call, the topic surfaced as analysts questioned how large banks view the accelerating push for stablecoin adoption. The response made it clear that while Wall Street may be warming to digital assets, it is far from comfortable with every innovation emerging from the crypto ecosystem.
JPMorgan’s Core Concern: Banking Without Bank Rules
Jeremy Barnum, JPMorgan’s Chief Financial Officer, delivered one of the strongest warnings yet from a major US bank. According to Barnum, interest-bearing stablecoins pose a structural risk because they closely resemble traditional bank deposits while operating outside the established regulatory framework.
His concern centers on the idea that these assets can function like savings accounts by holding dollar-pegged value and generating yield, yet they do so without capital requirements, liquidity rules, deposit insurance, or prudential oversight. In Barnum’s view, this combination creates what he described as a parallel banking system, one that mirrors banking services but lacks the safeguards built over centuries of financial regulation.
JPMorgan emphasized that its stance is not anti-innovation. The bank continues to support blockchain technology, tokenized assets, and regulated digital finance. What it opposes is the replication of core banking functions without equivalent responsibility or supervision.
The GENIUS Act and the Push for Guardrails
Barnum’s remarks align closely with the intent of the GENIUS Act, a proposed US legislative framework designed to impose clear boundaries on stablecoin issuance and operation. The bill aims to ensure that stablecoins remain tools for payments and settlement rather than evolving into shadow deposit products that compete directly with banks.
Lawmakers backing the bill argue that stablecoins should not offer passive interest simply for holding a token, as this would blur the line between crypto instruments and regulated deposits. Supporters believe guardrails are necessary before stablecoins reach mass adoption, particularly as institutional and retail users increasingly rely on them for dollar exposure.
Why Yield Changes Everything for Stablecoins
Stablecoins have already transformed global payments by offering near-instant settlement, 24/7 availability, and borderless access to US dollars. Their rapid growth reflects dissatisfaction with slow banking rails and limited access in many regions.
However, the introduction of yield dramatically changes their role. When stablecoins begin paying interest, they stop being mere transactional tools and start competing directly with bank deposits, money market funds, and savings accounts. This is where traditional financial institutions see a serious threat, especially at a time when bank deposit rates remain relatively low.
From the banking industry’s perspective, yield-bearing stablecoins could attract capital away from regulated institutions while avoiding the obligations that banks must meet to protect depositors and maintain systemic stability.
Congress Intensifies Scrutiny on Stablecoin Rewards
The regulatory debate is now firmly in the hands of US lawmakers. A newly amended draft of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act signals a clear intention to prevent stablecoins from functioning like interest-bearing deposits. Under the proposed language, crypto service providers would be prohibited from offering yield solely for holding a stablecoin.
At the same time, lawmakers are leaving room for innovation. Incentives linked to broader ecosystem participation, such as liquidity provision, governance involvement, or network-level activity, may still be permitted. This distinction suggests regulators are not trying to suppress crypto rewards entirely, but rather to prevent stablecoins from becoming unregulated savings products.
Market Reality: Innovation Will Not Slow Down
Despite regulatory pressure, demand for stablecoins continues to grow globally. Users value their speed, transparency, and accessibility, particularly in regions where traditional banking is expensive or unreliable. The question is no longer whether stablecoins will play a role in the future of finance, but how that role will be defined and regulated.
Crypto markets have historically adapted quickly to regulatory change, often finding compliant structures that preserve innovation while satisfying legal requirements. This evolution is already visible in the rise of regulated exchanges, licensed custodians, and compliant derivatives platforms.
Where Platforms Like BYDFi Fit Into the Picture
As the stablecoin debate intensifies, traders and investors are increasingly seeking platforms that balance innovation with responsible risk management. BYDFi has positioned itself as a crypto trading platform that embraces market evolution while offering users transparent tools for spot and derivatives trading.
Rather than relying on passive yield mechanics that face regulatory uncertainty, BYDFi focuses on empowering users through advanced trading features, deep liquidity, and access to major digital assets in a secure environment. As regulatory clarity improves, platforms that align with compliance-friendly innovation are likely to benefit the most.
For traders navigating an evolving stablecoin landscape, choosing exchanges that prioritize sustainability over short-term incentives is becoming a key strategic decision.
The Bigger Picture for Crypto and Banking
The warnings from JPMorgan highlight a broader truth about the crypto industry’s maturation. As digital assets grow closer to traditional finance, they inevitably attract the same scrutiny and responsibility. Yield-bearing stablecoins sit at the center of this transition, challenging regulators to strike a balance between innovation and systemic safety.
Whether lawmakers ultimately restrict or reshape stablecoin rewards, one thing is certain: the outcome will shape the next chapter of digital finance. For investors, traders, and platforms alike, adapting early to this reality may be the difference between long-term growth and regulatory friction.
2026-01-19 · 16 days ago0 076
Popular Questions
How to Use Bappam TV to Watch Telugu, Tamil, and Hindi Movies?
How to Withdraw Money from Binance to a Bank Account in the UAE?
ISO 20022 Coins: What They Are, Which Cryptos Qualify, and Why It Matters for Global Finance
Bitcoin Dominance Chart: Your Guide to Crypto Market Trends in 2025
The Best DeFi Yield Farming Aggregators: A Trader's Guide