关于【Blockchain】问题列表

As someone working in the tech industry in the U.S., I’m worried about the ongoing wave of IT layoffs and tech layoffs that seem to hit every few months. I’ve seen reports of big tech layoffs at companies like Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta, and it’s making me anxious about job security.

Are layoffs in tech still happening in 2025, or is there an end in sight? I want to know what’s driving these layoffs, if tech companies are still laying off, and when we might see some stability.

I’m also curious about how this affects opportunities in emerging fields like cryptocurrency or blockchain.The news about big tech layoffs is everywhere, and it feels like even profitable companies are cutting jobs.

The cryptocurrency market is moving fast. We have transitioned from the era of slow, expensive Layer 1 blockchains to the high-speed "express lanes" of Layer 2. Now, as we approach 2026, we are entering the era of Layer 3.

Layer 3 networks, or "App-Chains," are specialized blockchains dedicated to a single specific purpose—like a high-performance video game or a decentralized social network. They offer what previous generations could not: zero gas fees for users, instant speeds, and complete customization.

For investors, this represents a massive shift. Capital is beginning to flow into these specialized ecosystems. In this guide, we highlight the top Layer 3 projects and the infrastructure tokens that are best positioned to dominate this new sector in 2026.

1. Xai (XAI)

If you are betting on crypto gaming driving mass adoption, Xai is the project to watch. Built on top of Arbitrum, Xai was developed specifically to solve the biggest headache in blockchain gaming: the complexity.

What makes it unique?
Xai operates as a Layer 3 that "abstracts away" the blockchain. This means traditional gamers can play games, trade items, and earn rewards without ever needing to manage a complex crypto wallet or pay gas fees.

Why it is a top pick for 2026?
As more AAA-quality games launch on the blockchain, they need a home that can handle millions of transactions per second without clogging up. Xai is currently the frontrunner in this space, making it a high-potential play for the upcoming gaming cycle.

2. Degen (DEGEN)

Degen is one of the most fascinating stories in the crypto space. It started as a simple reward token for users of the "Farcaster" social media protocol but quickly evolved into its own Layer 3 blockchain built on Base.

What makes it unique?
Degen is the first "community-first" Layer 3. It is designed specifically for low-cost, high-frequency micro-transactions—like tipping a content creator a few cents. Because it is an L3, these transactions cost fractions of a penny.

Why it is a top pick for 2026:
The "SocialFi" (Social Finance) sector is predicted to grow massively. Degen has captured a loyal, cult-like following that rivals major memecoins, but it has the technical utility of a serious blockchain.

3. Arbitrum (ARB)

While Arbitrum is technically a Layer 2 scaling solution, it is the most critical infrastructure player for the Layer 3 revolution. Through its technology stack called Arbitrum Orbit, it allows developers to launch their own Layer 3 chains easily.

What makes it unique?
Think of Arbitrum as the landlord. When projects like Xai (and dozens of others) build their Layer 3 chains, they build them on top of Arbitrum. This secures their networks and drives value back to the Arbitrum ecosystem.

Why it is a top pick for 2026:
Investing in Arbitrum is the safer "infrastructure bet." Instead of trying to pick which specific Layer 3 game or app will win, you are betting on the platform that powers them all.

4. Optimism (OP)

Optimism has a grand vision called the Superchain. They are not just building a blockchain; they are building a network of interconnected Layer 2 and Layer 3 chains that can all talk to each other seamlessly.

What makes it unique?
The "OP Stack" is the software that powers this vision. It has been adopted by some of the biggest names in the world. For example, Coinbase used it to build their Base chain, and Sony is exploring it for their own blockchain initiatives.

Why it is a top pick for 2026:
As major corporations enter Web3, they are choosing the OP Stack to build their custom chains. This institutional adoption positions Optimism as a titan of Layer 3 infrastructure for years to come.

5. Orbs (ORBS)

Orbs sits in a unique position. It doesn't try to replace L1s or L2s; instead, it acts as a decentralized backend that enhances them. It is often referred to as "Layer 3" infrastructure because it handles complex logic that smart contracts on Ethereum can't handle efficiently.

What makes it unique?
Orbs focuses on making DeFi trading better. It powers advanced trading protocols, liquidity aggregators, and decentralized derivatives.

Why it is a top pick for 2026:
As Decentralized Finance (DeFi) tries to compete with traditional stock markets, it needs the advanced execution logic that Orbs provides. It is a vital piece of plumbing for the financial side of crypto.

How to Position Your Portfolio

The "Layer 3" narrative is all about specialization.

• For high growth potential, look at specific Layer 3 tokens like Xai (XAI) and Degen (DEGEN).
• For long-term stability, look at the foundational layers that host these chains, specifically Arbitrum (ARB) and Optimism (OP).

If you've spent any time exploring yield farming, you've undoubtedly come across its most intimidating and misunderstood risk: Impermanent Loss. It sounds scary, it's confusing, and it's the number one reason newcomers lose money, even when they think they're earning a profit.

But it doesn't have to be a mystery. As your guide, I'm going to demystify this concept for you. We'll use a simple analogy and a clear example to show you exactly what it is, how it happens, and how to think about it as part of your strategy.

The Core Concept: The Balancing Scale

Before we can understand Impermanent Loss, we must first understand how a typical liquidity pool works. Most pools, especially for yield farming, are like a perfectly balanced scale. You must deposit an equal value of two different assets. For example, if you want to provide liquidity to an ETH/USDC pool and Ethereum is worth $3,000, you would need to deposit 1 ETH and 3,000 USDC. Your total deposit is worth $6,000, perfectly balanced 50/50 in value. The protocol's job is to always keep this scale balanced, no matter what.

What Impermanent Loss Actually Is

Now, here is the most important thing to understand: Impermanent Loss is not a loss in the traditional sense. It is an opportunity cost. It is the difference in value between your assets inside the liquidity pool versus what their value would have been if you had simply held them in your wallet. This difference occurs when the price of one of the assets changes significantly compared to the other.

A Practical Example in Action

Let's go back to our balancing scale. You deposited 1 ETH and 3,000 USDC into the pool. Now, imagine the price of Ethereum doubles to $6,000 on the open market. Arbitrage traders will now come to your pool and buy the "cheap" ETH from it until the pool's price matches the market. To keep the scale balanced at a 50/50 value ratio, the pool's algorithm will have sold some of your ETH as its price went up.

Your pool now contains approximately 0.707 ETH and 4,242 USDC. The total value is $8,484. That's a great profit! But wait. What if you had just held your original 1 ETH and 3,000 USDC in your wallet? Their value would now be $6,000 (from the ETH) + $3,000 (from the USDC) = $9,000.

The difference—$9,000 - 8,484—is **516**. That is your Impermanent Loss. It's "impermanent" because if the price of ETH returns to its original price of $3,000, this loss disappears.

So, Why Would Anyone Do This? The Role of Fees

You might be asking, "Why would I ever provide liquidity if I'm just going to underperform holding?" The answer is trading fees. As a liquidity provider, you earn a percentage of the fees from every trade that happens in your pool. The entire game of yield farming is a bet that the fees you earn over time will be greater than any impermanent loss you might incur.

Understanding this risk is absolutely essential before you engage in any form of yield farming, especially the more complex strategies like [cross-chain yield farming].

In the world of cryptocurrency, "blockchain" has become the default term for the technology that powers it all. But what if there was a different, potentially more efficient way to achieve the same goals of security and decentralization? This is the question answered by the hashgraph, the innovative technology that powers the Hedera network. While both are types of Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), they are fundamentally different in how they are structured and how they reach consensus. As your guide, we will explore this difference in simple, relatable terms.

The Blockchain: A Single, Ordered Line

First, let's revisit the technology you already know. A blockchain can be thought of as a single, chronological chain of blocks. Imagine a group of people trying to write a book together, but there's only one pen. They must wait in a single-file line, and only one person at a time can add a new page (a "block") to the end of the book. This linear, one-at-a-time process, while incredibly secure, can be slow and inefficient, leading to network congestion and high fees.

The Hashgraph: A Web of "Gossip"

The hashgraph takes a completely different approach. Instead of a single line, imagine that same group of people in a large room, all with their own copies of the book. When someone wants to add a new piece of information, they don't get in line; they simply "gossip" that information to a few of their neighbors. Those neighbors then gossip the information to their neighbors, and so on.

This "gossip about gossip" protocol spreads information through the network exponentially, like a wave. Every piece of information is timestamped, and through a clever mathematical process, the entire network can quickly and efficiently agree on the exact order of all the events without ever needing to bundle them into slow, single blocks. The resulting structure is not a chain, but a complex, interwoven web of transactions.

The Key Differences: A Head-to-Head Comparison

This fundamental difference in structure leads to several critical distinctions.

The Verdict: Which Is Better?

It is not a simple question of which is "better," but rather a matter of different designs with different trade-offs. The blockchain is a battle-tested, proven model that is the foundation of the most secure networks in the world, like Bitcoin. Its simplicity is a core part of its security. The hashgraph is a theoretically more performant and efficient model that offers incredible speed and fairness, making it ideal for high-throughput, enterprise-grade applications. It is the engine that powers the entire Hedera network. To learn more about the project built on this technology, you can read our main guide: [What Is Hedera (HBAR)? A Guide to the Hashgraph Network].