Related Questions
A total of 5 cryptocurrency questions
Share Your Thoughts with BYDFi
Trending
Celebrity NFTs: Who Owns the Most Expensive Assets?
Key Takeaways:
- High-profile stars used Celebrity NFTs like Bored Apes as digital status symbols to signal wealth and relevance.
- Investing in these assets carries extreme risks, including liquidity crunches and volatility where values can drop 90% overnight.
- Buying an NFT requires setting up a self-custodial wallet, purchasing Ethereum, and navigating a marketplace like OpenSea.
The rise of Celebrity NFTs changed the perception of digital art forever. Before 2021, collecting art was a hobby reserved for the quiet elite in auction houses like Sotheby’s. But when global superstars started changing their Twitter profile pictures to cartoon monkeys, the world paid attention.
In 2026, the dust has settled on the initial mania. We can now look back to see who bought the top and who is still holding. The list of owners reads like a "Who's Who" of the entertainment industry, proving that digital ownership is the ultimate modern flex.
Who Are the Biggest Holders?
Justin Bieber made headlines when he purchased a Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFT for a staggering $1.3 million (500 ETH at the time). Critics mocked the purchase when prices dipped, but Bieber held on. His purchase cemented Celebrity NFTs as a legitimate asset class for the ultra-wealthy.
Eminem, the rap legend, famously bought a Bored Ape that looked exactly like him. He paid roughly $460,000 for the digital avatar. Snoop Dogg went even further, revealing himself as a prominent NFT whale with a wallet worth millions, collecting everything from CryptoPunks to generative art blocks.
What Are the Risks of Investing in NFTs?
While superstars can afford to lose millions, the average investor must understand the dangers. The biggest risk with Celebrity NFTs is liquidity. Unlike Bitcoin or Ethereum, which you can sell instantly on an exchange, an NFT requires a specific buyer.
If the market crashes, buyers disappear. You might own an asset "worth" $100,000 on paper, but if nobody offers to buy it, it is effectively worthless. This is known as the "illiquidity trap."
Volatility is another major factor. The Justin Bieber example serves as a warning. The asset he bought for $1.3 million dropped in value to under $60,000 during the bear market. Digital art is speculative, and prices are driven entirely by hype and sentiment, which can vanish overnight.
How Do You Buy Celebrity NFTs?
If you understand the risks and still want to collect, the process is different from buying normal crypto. You cannot buy an NFT directly on most centralized exchanges.
First, you need to buy Ethereum (ETH). This is the currency used for most celebrity NFTs. You can purchase ETH on a regulated platform like BYDFi. Next, you must transfer that ETH to a self-custodial wallet like MetaMask or Phantom.
Finally, you connect that wallet to an NFT marketplace like OpenSea, Blur, or Magic Eden. Search for the collection (e.g., "Bored Ape Yacht Club"), find the specific asset you want, and click buy. Ensure you have enough ETH to cover the "gas fees" for the transaction.
Have the Values Recovered in 2026?
The market for Celebrity NFTs took a massive hit during the crypto winter. Many assets lost 90% of their floor value. However, the premium collections have shown resilience.
In 2026, we are seeing a shift from speculation to historical appreciation. The specific NFTs owned by celebrities have gained a "provenance premium." Just as a guitar owned by Jimi Hendrix is worth more than a standard guitar, a Bored Ape owned by Justin Bieber commands a higher price than a standard one.
Conclusion
Whether you view them as overpriced JPEGs or historical artifacts, Celebrity NFTs have undeniable cultural impact. They brought blockchain technology to the dinner tables of millions who had never heard of Ethereum.
You might not have $1 million for a Bored Ape, but you can trade the tokens that power these ecosystems. Register at BYDFi today to buy the Ethereum you need to start your digital art collection.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Did Justin Bieber sell his NFT?
A: Public ledger data suggests he held the asset through the crash. While the dollar value dropped significantly, he retains ownership of the specific token.Q: Can I get scammed buying NFTs?
A: Yes. A common scam involves fake collections that look identical to the real ones. Always check for the "verified" checkmark on the marketplace before buying.Q: Do I own the copyright to my NFT?
A: It depends on the collection. Some Celebrity NFTs like Bored Apes give owners full commercial rights, while others only grant a license for personal use. Read the terms before buying.2026-02-02 · 4 days agoPOLAND ERUPTS: President’s Shock Veto Sparks a National War Over Crypto Freedom
BREAKING: Polish President Vetoes Landmark Crypto Bill in Stunning Move, Sparking Freedom vs. Chaos Political Showdown
Warsaw, Poland – In a dramatic political maneuver that has thrown the nation's financial future into the spotlight, Polish President Karol Nawrocki has vetoed the highly contentious Crypto-Asset Market Act, branding it a dangerous threat to civil liberties and economic innovation. The veto, announced late Monday, sets the stage for a fierce constitutional clash and has cleaved the Polish political landscape into two opposing camps: one heralding it as a victory for freedom, the other condemning it as an invitation to financial chaos.
The President's Stand: A Defense of Freedom and Innovation
President Nawrocki's veto was not a mere procedural step, but a forceful ideological declaration. His office issued a blistering critique of the bill, which had previously cleared parliamentary approval, framing the decision as a necessary defense of core Polish values.
The President's core objections are threefold:
1- The Draconian Website-Blocking Power: The bill granted authorities sweeping, opaque powers to block websites operating in the crypto market with minimal oversight. "This provision creates a tool for censorship that can be easily abused," the presidential statement argued. It is a direct threat to digital freedoms and sets a dangerous precedent that undermines the openness of the internet in Poland.
2- A Bureaucratic Monster of "Overregulation": The president lambasted the bill's extreme complexity—a dense, sprawling document that critics say only lobbyists and lawyers could love. This is not regulation; this is suffocation, Nawrocki stated. He contrasted Poland's approach with the more streamlined, business-friendly frameworks of neighbors like the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary, arguing that the bill would achieve one thing only: "Overregulation is the fastest way to drive innovative companies, talent, and tax revenue to Vilnius, Prague, or Malta.
3- Stifling Competition, Killing the Startup Spirit: A particularly criticized aspect was the structure of prohibitive supervisory fees. The president warned that these fees were calibrated to benefit only deep-pocketed foreign corporations and traditional banks, while crushing domestic Polish startups and entrepreneurs. This is a perverse reversal of logic. Instead of fostering a competitive, homegrown market, it kills it in its cradle. It is a direct attack on Polish innovation and ambition, he asserted.
Political Backlash: Accusations of Choosing Chaos
The veto triggered an immediate and furious response from the heart of the government, revealing a deep rift within the ruling coalition.
1- Finance Minister Andrzej Domański took to X with a stark warning: As a result of abuses in this market, 20% of clients are already losing their money. By vetoing this bill, the President has chosen chaos. He must now bear full responsibility for the consequences. His post was accompanied by charts implying rising consumer risks without regulation.
2- Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski echoed the sentiment, framing the veto as an abandonment of consumer protection. "The purpose of this law was to bring order to the wild west of crypto. When the speculative bubble bursts and thousands of Polish families lose their savings, they will know exactly who to thank, he posted, aiming his remarks directly at the president's constituency.
The government's narrative is clear: the veto leaves Polish consumers dangerously exposed to fraud and market manipulation in a volatile sector, prioritizing ideological purity over practical safety.
Crypto Community Fights Back: A Historic Victory for Common Sense
In stark contrast, the veto was met with jubilation and relief by the Polish crypto industry, libertarian politicians, and digital advocates.
1- Tomasz Mentzen, a prominent pro-crypto politician who had publicly campaigned against the bill, hailed the decision: The President has listened to reason and to the people. This veto protects Poles from becoming a digitally surveilled colony and keeps our economy open to the future.
2- Economist and blockchain expert Krzysztof Piech dismantled the government's criticism. "Holding the president responsible for scams is absurd. That is the job of the police and financial regulators under existing laws, he argued. He also delivered the community's trump card: "The panic is manufactured. The EU's comprehensive MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) regulations come into full force across all member states in July 2026. This rushed, flawed Polish law was unnecessary and would have only created a contradictory, hostile local regime for two years before being superseded by EU law.
What Happens Next? A Nation at a Regulatory Crossroads
The political drama is now entering a new phase with significant implications.
- Legislative Limbo: The bill returns to the lower house of parliament, the Sejm. To override a presidential veto, the government must muster a three-fifths supermajority—a significantly higher threshold than the simple majority used to pass it initially. This will be a major test of the ruling coalition's cohesion and strength.
- The MiCA Shadow: The impending EU-wide MiCA regulations loom large over the debate. Opponents of the vetoed bill ask: If MiCA is coming, why the rush with a potentially harmful national law? Proponents counter that Poland cannot afford a two-year regulatory vacuum where consumers are unprotected.
- Global Signal: Poland, as one of Central Europe's largest economies, is sending a signal to the global crypto industry. The president's veto is being interpreted internationally as a potential openness to a more innovation-friendly approach, potentially attracting projects wary of heavier-handed regimes in other EU nations.
BOTTOM LINE
President Nawrocki's veto is more than a policy dispute; it is a high-stakes battle over Poland's identity in the digital age. It pits a vision of a tightly controlled, state-protected market against one of entrepreneurial freedom and minimal interference, all under the shadow of overarching EU rules. The coming weeks will determine whether Poland's crypto landscape becomes a protected fortress or an open frontier—a decision that will resonate far beyond its borders.
- Buy Crypto in Minutes — Start Trading on BYDFi Today
B22389817 · 2026-01-20 · 17 days agoWhat Exactly is an NFT? A Guide for Total Beginners
You've seen the headlines: a piece of digital art sells for millions, a video clip becomes a collector's item, a simple cartoon avatar is suddenly worth more than a car. And every time, you hear the same three letters: N-F-T.
It can feel confusing, and maybe even a little absurd. But what if I told you the idea behind an NFT (Non-Fungible Token) is actually quite simple, and it represents one of the biggest shifts in ownership we've seen in a generation?
Let's break it down together. No jargon, no nonsense.
The Easiest Analogy: The Mona Lisa vs. a Dollar Bill
To understand "non-fungible," let's first think about what "fungible" means.
A dollar bill is fungible. If you and I swap dollar bills, we both still have one dollar. They are identical in value and interchangeable.The Mona Lisa painting is non-fungible. It is a one-of-a-kind original. If we tried to swap it for another painting, we would have something completely different. It has unique properties and cannot be replaced.
An NFT is simply a digital version of the Mona Lisa. It’s a unique, one-of-a-kind digital item that you can truly own. A "fungible" token, like Bitcoin, is like a digital dollar—one Bitcoin is the same as another. An nft token is unique.
Breaking Down the Name: Non-Fungible Token
Non-Fungible: As we covered, it means it's unique and cannot be replaced one-for-one.Token: This just means it's a digital certificate of ownership that lives on a blockchain.
So, what does NFT stand for? Non-Fungible Token. It's a unique digital ownership certificate. That's it.
How Does it Actually Work? The Role of the Blockchain
So, what stops someone from just right-clicking and saving a copy of an NFT image? This is where the NFT blockchain comes in.
An NFT is recorded on a public ledger, most commonly the Ethereum blockchain. Think of the blockchain as a global, indestructible notebook that tracks who owns what. When you buy an NFT, your ownership is recorded in this notebook for the entire world to see. It’s a digital proof of authenticity and ownership that cannot be faked or altered. This is all managed by what's called a smart contract, which is the code that governs the token's rules.
The "So What?" — Why NFTs Matter Beyond Art
This is where it gets really exciting. The concept of provable digital ownership is much bigger than just art. We are starting to see NFTs used for:
- Gaming: Owning unique in-game items (like a rare sword or character skin) that you can actually sell or trade.
- Event Tickets: A concert ticket as an NFT can't be counterfeited and could even become a collectible after the event.
- Digital Identity: Proving your identity or qualifications with a secure, unforgeable token.
- Real Estate: Representing ownership of a real-world property with a digital token.
NFTs are paving the way for a future where you can truly own your digital items, just like you own physical things. For a deeper dive into blockchain technology, you can .
How This Connects to Your Crypto Journey
The entire NFT ecosystem is built on cryptocurrencies. To buy, sell, or create an NFT, you typically need to use the native cryptocurrency of that blockchain, like Ethereum (ETH).
This means that understanding core digital assets is your first step into the world of NFTs. Platforms like BYDFi provide a secure and easy way to acquire the foundational cryptocurrencies that power this new digital economy.
2026-01-16 · 21 days agoHow Trump’s Crypto Regulations Transformed RWA Tokenization
Key Points
- Trump’s second administration replaced regulatory fear with legal clarity across the US crypto sector.
- Stablecoin regulation became the foundation for scalable real-world asset tokenization.
- Banks and institutions finally gained the confidence to custody and issue tokenized assets.
- Regulatory certainty transformed RWAs from experiments into institutional-grade products.
- The on-chain RWA market expanded rapidly, reaching an estimated $30–$35 billion in 2025.
A New Political Era for Crypto in the United States
When Donald Trump returned to the White House in January 2025 after his re-election, the message from Washington was unmistakable. The United States would no longer treat crypto innovation as a regulatory threat, but as a strategic opportunity. Trump’s promise to turn the US into the “crypto capital of the planet” marked a decisive shift away from the enforcement-heavy policies that had dominated previous years.
This change did not happen overnight, nor was it symbolic. Through executive action, legislative momentum, and regulatory restructuring, the Trump administration laid the groundwork for a clearer, more practical digital asset environment. One of the biggest beneficiaries of this shift was the tokenization of real-world assets, commonly known as RWAs.
Tokenization had long been discussed as the bridge between traditional finance and blockchain technology. Yet for years, regulatory uncertainty kept banks, asset managers, and institutions on the sidelines. That hesitation began to disappear in 2025.
Why Regulation Was the Missing Piece for RWA Tokenization
Before Trump’s second term, tokenized real-world assets existed mostly as pilot projects. The technology worked, but the legal risks were simply too high. Institutions were unsure whether tokenized bonds or real estate would be classified as securities, commodities, or something else entirely. Even worse, stablecoins, the core settlement layer for RWAs, lacked a federal regulatory framework.
Without clear rules, banks feared enforcement actions, balance-sheet risks, and reputational damage. As a result, tokenization remained fragmented and underutilized. The Trump administration recognized that innovation could not scale without certainty, and it responded by reshaping the regulatory environment from the ground up.
Stablecoins as the Foundation of Tokenized Finance
One of the most impactful changes came with the introduction of the GENIUS Act in July 2025. This legislation finally established a comprehensive federal framework for stablecoins, which had already become essential to crypto markets but operated in a legal gray area.
The act mandated full reserve backing, regular audits, and strict compliance with anti-money laundering standards. By introducing a dual federal and state oversight model, it eliminated confusion about regulatory authority and compliance expectations.
This clarity transformed stablecoins into trusted digital dollars. For tokenized real-world assets, this was a turning point. Stablecoins now offered a reliable settlement layer for buying, selling, and collateralizing assets like treasuries, corporate bonds, and real estate. With legal risk reduced, financial institutions could integrate stablecoins directly into tokenization platforms without fear of future crackdowns.
Ending the SEC vs CFTC Confusion
Another major obstacle to RWA adoption had been the ongoing jurisdictional battle between the SEC and the CFTC. Projects considering tokenization had no clear answer to a basic question: which regulator would oversee them?
The proposed CLARITY Act, passed by the House in 2025, addressed this issue head-on. By defining categories for digital commodities and clarifying oversight responsibilities, the bill reduced the risk that tokenized assets would suddenly be labeled illegal securities.
Although the act has not yet become law, its passage signaled a strong political commitment to regulatory transparency. That signal alone was enough to restore confidence among developers, banks, and institutional investors. With clearer boundaries, tokenized real-world assets could be designed to comply from day one rather than hoping for regulatory forgiveness later.
How Custody Reform Unlocked Institutional Participation
Perhaps the most underappreciated reform was the repeal of SAB 121 in early 2025. Under the original rule, banks that held crypto assets on behalf of clients were required to record those assets on their own balance sheets. This created massive capital and risk-management challenges, making crypto custody unattractive for traditional financial institutions.
The introduction of SAB 122 reversed this approach. Banks no longer had to treat customer crypto holdings as their own assets and liabilities. This seemingly technical change had enormous implications. It allowed banks to offer crypto custody services at scale, opening the door for institutional-grade tokenization platforms.
Once custody became viable, tokenized RWAs followed naturally. Banks could now safely hold tokenized bonds, funds, and treasuries for clients, bringing real-world assets fully on-chain.
Regulated Markets for Tokenized Assets
Liquidity is essential for any financial market, and tokenized assets were no exception. In August 2025, the CFTC launched its Crypto Sprint initiative to accelerate the approval of spot crypto products and tokenized collateral on regulated platforms.
This initiative clarified that tokenized real-world assets could be listed, traded, and used as collateral within compliant market structures. For institutions, this removed one of the final barriers to adoption. Tokenized assets were no longer isolated blockchain experiments; they could now participate in regulated financial ecosystems with real liquidity and price discovery.
Privacy, Control, and the Absence of a US CBDC
The Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act further shaped the environment by prohibiting the issuance of a US central bank digital currency. While controversial, this move reassured both institutions and individuals concerned about transaction monitoring and government control.
By rejecting a centralized digital dollar, the administration implicitly supported private-sector stablecoins as the primary digital settlement layer. This decision reinforced decentralized tokenization models and encouraged innovation without the fear of state-level surveillance embedded in the system.
From Experimental Technology to Institutional Market
By the end of 2025, the impact of these policies was impossible to ignore. Tokenized real-world assets had evolved from niche pilots into a rapidly growing institutional market. Tokenized US treasuries, private credit instruments, and yield-bearing assets dominated the space, attracting asset managers, hedge funds, and banks alike.
Estimates place the total on-chain RWA market between $30 and $35 billion, driven not by hype but by regulatory clarity and institutional trust. For the first time, blockchain infrastructure aligned with traditional finance requirements.
The Bigger Picture for the Future of Tokenization
Trump’s crypto policy changes did more than boost market size. They redefined how innovation interacts with regulation in the United States. By replacing ambiguity with structure, the administration demonstrated that clear rules do not suppress innovation; they accelerate it.
Real-world asset tokenization is no longer a theoretical use case. It is becoming a core pillar of modern financial infrastructure, powered by compliant stablecoins, institutional custody, and regulated markets.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What are real-world assets (RWAs) in crypto?
Real-world assets are physical or traditional financial assets, such as real estate, bonds, treasuries, or credit instruments, that are represented on the blockchain through tokenization.
Why did Trump’s crypto policies matter for RWAs?
Because tokenization requires legal certainty, banking participation, and trusted settlement layers. Trump’s policies reduced regulatory risk and enabled institutions to participate confidently.
How did stablecoin regulation impact tokenization?
Clear stablecoin rules created reliable digital dollars that could be used to settle, trade, and collateralize tokenized assets at scale.
Why was the repeal of SAB 121 important?
It allowed banks to custody crypto assets without balance-sheet penalties, unlocking institutional custody and large-scale tokenization.
Is the RWA market still growing?
Yes. With regulatory clarity in place, tokenized treasuries, private credit, and funds continue to expand as institutions move on-chain.
As regulatory clarity accelerates the growth of tokenized real-world assets, choosing the right trading platform becomes essential. BYDFi provides a secure and user-friendly environment for accessing crypto markets, managing digital assets, and exploring emerging on-chain opportunities. With strong compliance standards and advanced trading tools, BYDFi is positioning itself as a reliable gateway for both new and experienced investors entering the next phase of digital finance.
2026-02-06 · a minute agoBitcoin Drawdown: Will History Repeat with a 50% Crash?
Key Takeaways:
- Historical data confirms that a 30% to 50% Bitcoin drawdown is a standard occurrence, even during the most aggressive bull markets.
- These corrections serve to flush out excessive leverage, resetting the market for sustainable long-term growth.
- In 2026, institutional ETF support may dampen the depth of these crashes, but volatility remains a core feature of the asset class.
Every crypto investor fears the charts turning red. However, a significant Bitcoin drawdown is not a sign of the apocalypse; it is usually just a pit stop. As we analyze the market structure in 2026, whispers of a major correction are circulating again.
Veterans of the 2017 and 2021 cycles know the pattern well. Price explodes upward, euphoria sets in, and then suddenly, the market sheds 50% of its value in weeks. Understanding why this happens—and why it might happen again—is the key to surviving the cycle without panic selling at the bottom.
Why Do 50% Drops Happen During Bull Runs?
It seems counterintuitive for an asset to crash while it is winning. The primary driver of a sharp Bitcoin drawdown is leverage. When traders get too greedy, they borrow money to bet on the price going up.
Eventually, the market runs out of new buyers. A small price dip triggers a chain reaction of liquidations. As leveraged "Long" positions are forced to sell, they drive the price down further, triggering more liquidations. This "flush" cleans out the gamblers, allowing spot buyers to re-accumulate at fair prices.
Is This Time Different Due to ETFs?
The popular narrative in 2026 is that "this time is different" because of Wall Street. The theory is that Spot ETFs provide a constant bid that prevents prices from falling too far.
While it is true that institutions hold stronger hands than retail traders, they are not immune to fear. A Bitcoin drawdown can still occur if macroeconomic conditions worsen. If the stock market crashes or interest rates spike, even BlackRock and Fidelity clients may sell to raise cash, proving that Bitcoin is not yet immune to gravity.
How Long Do These Corrections Last?
Speed is the defining factor of crypto crashes. Unlike the stock market, which bleeds out over months, a crypto correction is often violent and fast.
Historical data shows that a major pullback typically lasts between 30 to 60 days. This is the "max pain" period where sentiment shifts from greed to extreme fear. Smart investors view this window not as a disaster, but as a discount period to lower their average entry price.
How Should Investors React?
The worst thing you can do during a Bitcoin drawdown is trade emotionally. Selling your assets after they have already dropped 40% is how wealth is transferred from the impatient to the patient.
The winning strategy is usually Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA). By buying small amounts regularly during the dip, you remove the stress of trying to time the absolute bottom. History favors those who buy when there is blood in the streets.
Conclusion
Volatility is the price you pay for performance. A 50% Bitcoin drawdown is the admission fee for the potential of 100% gains.
Instead of fearing the crash, prepare for it. Keep some "dry powder" (stablecoins) ready on the side. Register at BYDFi today to be ready to buy the dip instantly when the market presents its next great opportunity.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What is the biggest Bitcoin drawdown in history?
A: Bitcoin has suffered several drawdowns exceeding 80% during "Crypto Winters" (like 2014 and 2018), though bull market corrections are usually smaller (30-40%).Q: Do altcoins crash harder than Bitcoin?
A: Yes. When Bitcoin drops 10%, altcoins often drop 20% or more. During a major Bitcoin drawdown, altcoins can lose 70-90% of their value rapidly.Q: How do I hedge against a crash?
A: Traders can use "Short" positions or buy Put Options on derivatives platforms to profit when prices fall, offsetting losses in their spot portfolio.2026-02-05 · a day ago
Popular Tags
Popular Questions
How to Use Bappam TV to Watch Telugu, Tamil, and Hindi Movies?
How to Withdraw Money from Binance to a Bank Account in the UAE?
ISO 20022 Coins: What They Are, Which Cryptos Qualify, and Why It Matters for Global Finance
Bitcoin Dominance Chart: Your Guide to Crypto Market Trends in 2025
The Best DeFi Yield Farming Aggregators: A Trader's Guide