Related Questions

XRP Millionaire Wallets Surge as Market Fear Grows, Signaling Quiet Confidence

While much of the cryptocurrency market continues to wrestle with uncertainty and risk-off sentiment, XRP is quietly flashing a signal that long-term investors are watching closely. New on-chain data suggests that wealthy XRP holders are returning, even as broader market indicators remain stuck in fear territory.

According to fresh insights from blockchain analytics firm Santiment, the number of XRP wallets holding more than one million tokens has been steadily climbing since the beginning of 2026. This development comes at a time when overall crypto sentiment remains weak, making the trend particularly notable.

Wealthy XRP Holders Return Despite Price Stagnation

XRP’s price performance so far this year has been relatively muted. Since the start of 2026, the token has slipped by around 4%, hovering near the $1.87–$1.89 range. Under normal circumstances, declining or stagnant prices tend to push large holders away. However, Santiment’s data suggests the opposite is happening.

The analytics platform revealed that 42 new wallets holding more than one million XRP have reappeared on the ledger since January 1. This marks the first sustained increase in  millionaire  wallets since September, following a sharp decline late last year.

Between October and December, the number of high-value XRP wallets dropped by nearly 800, reflecting a period of distribution and reduced confidence. The recent reversal, however, suggests that deep-pocketed investors may be repositioning for the long term.

Santiment described the trend as an  encouraging sign,  particularly given the broader market environment. At current prices, a wallet holding one million XRP represents an investment of roughly $1.87 million, highlighting the scale of capital flowing back into the network.

Smart Money Accumulation Adds to the Bullish Case

Beyond raw wallet counts, other data points reinforce the idea that sophisticated investors are quietly accumulating XRP. According to figures from on-chain intelligence platform Nansen, so-called  smart money  traders have increased their XRP holdings by more than 11% over the past 30 days.

These traders, often defined by their historical profitability and strategic timing, are closely watched by market participants searching for early signals. Their renewed interest suggests growing confidence that XRP may be undervalued at current levels, despite short-term price stagnation.

Analysts Divided on XRP’s Near-Term Direction

While on-chain data paints a constructive long-term picture, analysts remain split on what XRP might do in the coming weeks.

Crypto trader CW noted on social media that XRP appears close to breaking through a significant selling wall. According to his analysis, buying pressure remains strong, and market structure is beginning to shift in favor of bulls. If resistance is cleared, CW believes XRP could make a move toward the $2.30 level.

Other industry voices are more cautious but still optimistic. Asset manager 21Shares recently pointed to XRP’s historical pattern of prolonged consolidation followed by sharp upward moves. When combined with increasing regulatory clarity and expanding institutional interest, the firm suggested XRP could be positioned for another meaningful price expansion.

Regulatory Narratives Cast a Shadow

Not everyone is convinced that XRP’s upside is guaranteed. Pav Hundal, lead analyst at Swyftx, has warned that XRP’s price action may be becoming overly dependent on narrative rather than fundamentals.

He emphasized that any unexpected developments surrounding the U.S. CLARITY Act voting process could apply short-term pressure to the asset. In such a scenario, sentiment-driven optimism could quickly give way to volatility.

This tension between structural optimism and regulatory uncertainty continues to define XRP’s outlook in early 2026.

A Market Still Dominated by Bitcoin

ETH Funding Rate Turns Negative: Is This a Trap or a Hidden Opportunity for Ether Bulls?

Ethereum has once again found itself at the center of market debate after its funding rate slipped into negative territory, a signal that often excites contrarian traders. Historically, negative funding rates tend to emerge when fear dominates the market, sometimes setting the stage for sharp rebounds. Yet this time, the broader context suggests that Ether investors may have valid reasons to hesitate.

Over the past week, Ether’s price action has reflected growing uncertainty across the crypto market. ETH suffered a sharp three-day correction of nearly 14%, revisiting the $2,900 support level for the first time in almost a month. This move coincided with a broader market pullback as traders reduced exposure to risk assets amid increasing economic and geopolitical tension.

Although Ether briefly reclaimed the $3,000 mark following news that US President Donald Trump suspended proposed import tariff hikes on several European Union countries, optimism quickly faded. The rebound lacked conviction, and traders remained cautious as liquidation data painted a sobering picture.

Liquidations Shake Confidence Across the ETH Market

One of the most damaging blows to market sentiment came from leveraged traders being flushed out at scale. In just two days, bullish Ether positions worth approximately $480 million were liquidated, highlighting how fragile confidence had become. Such liquidation cascades often reinforce bearish momentum, especially when they occur alongside weakening onchain indicators.

The sell-off also reflected a broader shift toward risk aversion. Macro uncertainty, combined with declining crypto liquidity, has made traders far less willing to hold aggressive long positions. This environment helps explain why Ether’s perpetual futures funding rate briefly turned negative.

What a Negative Funding Rate Really Signals

In normal conditions, Ether’s annualized funding rate tends to hover between 6% and 12%, with long traders paying a premium to maintain leveraged exposure. When the rate flips negative, it means short sellers are paying to keep their positions open, an unusual setup that can hint at overcrowded bearish trades.

However, a negative funding rate is not automatically bullish. In the current environment, it reflects hesitation rather than outright panic. Traders appear unwilling to commit capital, even when contrarian indicators suggest potential upside. This cautious stance is reinforced by declining institutional participation.

ETF Outflows Add to the Pressure

Institutional demand for Ether has shown visible cracks, particularly through spot ETF flows. US-listed Ether spot ETFs recorded roughly $230 million in net outflows in a single day, reversing the previous week’s steady inflow trend. With these ETFs collectively holding more than $17 billion worth of ETH, any sustained outflow represents a meaningful overhang on the market.

Adding to the concern, companies that previously embraced Ether as a treasury reserve asset are now facing mounting accounting losses. Firms such as Bitmine Immersion and Sharplink have seen their balance sheets pressured by ETH’s recent decline, raising questions about whether corporate accumulation strategies will continue.

Options Market Reveals Deep Unease, Not Panic

To better understand professional sentiment, it is essential to look beyond futures and examine the options market. The ETH options skew, which measures the relative pricing of downside versus upside protection, has surged to its highest level in seven weeks. Traders are currently paying a significant premium for downside exposure, signaling discomfort rather than aggressive bearish positioning.

This elevated skew reflects repeated failures by Ether to break above the $3,400 resistance level over the past two months. Each rejection has weakened trader confidence, particularly as Ethereum’s onchain activity shows signs of stagnation.

Falling Network Fees Raise Structural Concerns

Ethereum’s fundamentals have also come under scrutiny. Network fees have declined by roughly 20% over the past week, indicating reduced demand for block space. In contrast, competing blockchains such as Solana and BNB Chain have seen substantial increases in fee generation, highlighting a shift in user activity.

More notably, Solana continues to dominate transaction volume, with Ethereum’s base layer and scaling solutions collectively falling well behind. This growing competitive pressure in decentralized application processing has fueled doubts about Ethereum’s near-term growth narrative.

Trading ETH in a High-Uncertainty Environment

Key Takeaways:

• The debate over whether Ether is a security or a commodity determines how it is regulated.
• The approval of Spot ETFs largely signaled that regulators view ETH as a commodity.
• This classification protects the network from strict securities laws that apply to stocks.

The question of Ethereum security classification has been the biggest regulatory headache in crypto history. For years the SEC and the CFTC fought a turf war over who gets to regulate the second largest cryptocurrency. If it is a security it falls under strict banking laws. If it is a commodity it is treated like digital oil or gold.

This distinction matters because securities laws are designed for companies with CEOs and quarterly reports. Ethereum is a decentralized network with no central office. For investors in 2026 the answer to this question defines the safety and legality of their portfolio.

Why Is the Classification So Confusing?

The confusion stems from the 2014 ICO (Initial Coin Offering). In the beginning investors sent Bitcoin to the Ethereum Foundation and received Ether in return. This looked a lot like a stock sale which usually triggers Ethereum security laws.

However the network evolved. It became sufficiently decentralized. In 2018 a famous speech by William Hinman of the SEC suggested that ETH had morphed from a security into a commodity. This lack of clarity kept institutions on the sidelines for years as they feared a lawsuit.

Did the ETFs Settle the Debate?

Yes they largely did. When the US regulators approved Spot Ethereum ETFs they implicitly admitted that ETH is a commodity. You cannot have a Spot ETF for an unregistered security.